-
During the last general election (GE 12) campaign period, Pakatan Rakyat loudly champions the promise to have a local government election. After more than 40 years absence, I bet not many people knows what Local Government (LG) election is it all about and many do no have clues on how it is done. The people have been accustomed to process of having elected local government by government to accommodate various ethnic based political parties.
-
Najib is in a disagreement over the need to have such election. He says it is counter productive and will not improve public service. How is it that a person who is represented at the lowest level of government and elected by the local people can be said to be counter productive to the public service? Being the closest form of the government to the people, surely the people that is elected is expected to make things better for themselves as they lives in the community where they are elected.
-
Only a blind hearted man cannot see that the motive of not wanting to have a LG election is because of business and politics. I say business because potentially millions of dollars of small contracts may not go to party members and secondly the political influence on the ruling government may be adverse. In fact it is expected that the local government will be more of a federal and state politicians. If the Federal government can make life difficult for the State Government in view of their political ideology, what would they do if elected LG office bearers are not politically inclined.
-
The need of having local government election is about transparency, returning the power back to the people as well making the local authority more efficient. The local council will hire and fire the office bearers in the LG based on productivity. Something that the state or federal government cannot do. Only people that can make a difference will be elected and stay elected. In most likely scenario they will be politically neutral.
-
Raja Petra in his writing under the heading “Najib blinked first” also points out the political impact of having the local government election. Unfortunately what he failed to highlight is that both the Selangor and Penang government were merely making political moves. They are not sincere about the need to have a LG election. I think what they are doing is simply passing the buck to the Federal Government. They wants to send a message to the people that they wants to do it but the Federal Government did not want it and there fore it cannot be done. They are trying to run away from what they promise the people.

-
It is a known fact that legally a LG election cannot be done because it goes against the ACT 171 (Local Government Act 1976 Part 2 Item 10) which says that the local council members are to be appointed by the State Government. Item 10 say’s that “Councillors of the local authority shall be appointed from amongst persons the majority of whom shall be persons ordinarily resident in the local authority area who in the opinion of the State Authority have wide experience in local government affairs or who have achieved distinction in any profession, commerce or industry, or are otherwise capable of representing the interests of their communities in the local authority area”. The law is so simple and ordinary people can appreciate it. It is not written in Latin.
-
Clearly when Guan Eng sent the instruction to the Election Commission to conduct the LG election; it was done with a political intention in bad faith. In legal terms, I think the lawyers call it “mala fide”. The Penang and Selangor government simply do not want to do what they promised to the people by getting the Federal Government to say that it cannot be done. They know that the EC will reply and say that it cannot be done because of the provisions of ACT 171. In that sense, they have succeeded to prove a point and must be congratulated. Is that what the people want or what the people has been promised? The truth is while the LG election cannot be done, it does not mean that the State cannot let the people chose who should sit on the council. They can actually appoint people who are elected by the residents if they wanted to.

-
As an Illustration let me use Bukit Antarabangsa as an example. In BA there are about 10 residents associations (RA). If the State Government wanted to, it can ask the various RA to nominate 2 people to be chosen as a councillor. It means that out of 10 residents association there would be 20 candidates. Assuming that BA is given 2 seats for the local council, then this 20 people must have a small election to elect 2 best individuals whose name is to be forwarded to the State Government to be appointed. In this small manner of limited election, the people on ground have elected their representatives.
-
The State must appoint the candidate that has been nominated. It must not exercise its power of refusal to appoint (unless the nominees is a criminal or has broken any laws) The point that I am trying to make is that the State Government can still exercise its intention within the limitation of Act 171 if it wants to do so. Clearly it has not done so because they don’t want to do it. They just want to find the necessary excuses to give the people on why they “cannot” have an election and use the issue a political punching bag.
-
While the Penang and Selangor State Government has chosen to challenge the Federal Government via the Election Commission, I too would like to challenge the two state governments to try out my proposal instead of saying that it cannot be done. I have demonstrated here that “the peoples choice can be elected by the state in accordance of Act 171” if they want to. I would like to appeal to the State Government to stop playing politics and find ways to get things done rather than finding reasons why it cannot be done. The State must be creative in interpreting the laws. When there is a will, there is a way! and definitely “Malaysia Boleh”

Local council elections- politics of empowerment
March 10, 2010 by Dr R@28


EC should be involved, laws should be amended as this was taken away from the people by the Alliance guomen. If Najib’s father and Tunku have promised to return the third vote to the people, then the son Najib must adhere to the promise. He just cannot simply say No and giving a lame excuse. It is in fact the malfunction of local councils and their numerous corruption that caused the downfall of BN. Rakyat is not stupid anyway.
To give EC the power, change the ACT 171. Then EC will have to learn how to organize local government election
Just like learning how to milk a cow……, EC guy’s might be stiff…., but then again…….they are the biggest Idiot’s…….., who will sell their soul’s… They don’t believe in GOD……., they worship the ‘ PAGAN GODS ‘ .
So Bill me for the expenses…., you could .
In so many years I am there I didn’t even know one of my neighbour was the so called Chairman for a resident association that I never knew existed. IF what you are saying how election can be conducted citing BA as an example I rather let the present system to remain till they amend the LGA.
Most resident associations are controlled by people serving their self interest with few exceptions like yourself. In multi racial tamans it is unwritten rule that only Dato dato appointed so that easier to talk to the civil servants big shots who happens to be their own people.
Notice, the development taking place in the vicinity of BA and UP? I have been there since the 80s and I really now feel like tumpang staying there now.
Dear AlsoBA
Initially, I could not figure out what you meant in your writing. Then it struck me after discussing a fellow neighbor that probably you are talking about BARA. Am I right? If I am right, I would like to add the following:
(1) BARA despite its name does not represent the residents of Bukit Antarabangsa. They only represent their members. The last I check they have 20 members. The name that they use is misnomer and mal-representation. Under the Societies ACT 1966, severe punishment can be enforce to office bearers in misleading the public. All it need to is to lodge a written complain to ROS office. In this case it would be ROS Selangor. Their contact details is as follows:
Pengarah
Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhan Negeri Selangor
Kementerian Dalam Negeri
Tingkat 16, Wisma MBSA,
Persiaran Perbandaran.
40000 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan.
Telefon : 03 – 5510 6427/ 03 – 5510 6479
No. Faks : 03 – 5510 9281
In my opinion there is a strong case of mal-representation here. The ball is in your court.
Will do just that when I find out the actual name of the Asscn based on documentary proof ( right now I am not sure of the name) but then we all know how ROS works, don’t we?
If you want i can give you the full name and registration number.. email drrafick@gmail.com
Someone should ask Najib and his gang what they put on their nomination forms as the occupation? Most would have stated “full-time politician”. Now what does a “full-time politician” do but politicking. Sounds like he is talking through his a$$hole.
Dr.
Like your idea but would not suggest jumping into conclusion too quickly about LGE doing this in bad faith. The clearest way to find this out (big time) is for Najib to unequivocally says “yes, let’s have the 3d vote!” If LGE / Pakatan then backs down, people will see clearly.
The question is whether Najib is prepared to say “yes”. It’s his turn to call on this “high-stake poker game”.
Dear Dr. rafick,
I agree with the first 4 para.,
But I totally disagree wit Para 5, 6. and 7 1/2……, reasons, your delivery did not make sense…especially para 7.
Agree with you on the rest…..?
They did try on a mechanism for Local Election’s in Perak, sad to say…the turmoil in Perak put it in cold shower.,
PR did try….., they are new blocks….in a season field…., they were in no man’s land…., trying to appease the people to their very best……, sad some don’t appreciate and some don’t understand…..,
Why did PM Blink first….? You win or you lose all…!
Dr. Rafick….., your remedy……seems simple…., but then again quoting BA….. is out of the picture….. just ask how these can be conducted in dominant Chinese and Indian area’s where the TRIADS have all the say…., even to the extend of telling you what business you should be involved…
Please just don’t quote BA as a Example..!
Dear Balasi,
Interesting that you brought TRIADS into the picture. How sure are we that the TRIADS are not behind the politicians. Rubbing shoulders with them through intermediareis, the captains of the industries. The politicians are the vehicles and far behind the scenes are the power brokers controlling vide the economy. Money is the root of all evil and it is a question of conscience. Nil, little or lots of conscience !
Triads in resident associations? This is indeed news to me.
They play a role….., to what extend…..I don’t know…, but they do play a major role……., Dr. Rafick should take a stroll down the costal roads and visit the towns streching from JB to Kuala Kurau. ( Perak ).., then go up North.
Then I assume Doc will get the picture.
drrafick,
Para 6- i agree
Para 7- it reminds me about the passing of the Hudud Law
in Kelantan.
Para 8,9,10- I agree.
*** for a local councillors to be efficient and honest to their service to their people, first it is about the “right candidates” that is appointed by in any state goverment.
local council election by the EC would not do “any magic” in getting a right candidate being elected. (just look at the present elected representative in this 12 GE).
we may even seing more local “kataking” actively participating in long and short jump sports!
your suggested solution in appointing thru RA is something that should seriously be given consideration in getting the “most eligible in honesty and serving” their area in the existing local councils in all states.
Dear pelangisenja,
In most sub urban and rural area’s that are predominately non malay’s the TRIAD’s decide….., the same goes with MIC and MCA politic’s…..,
Don’t believe me…..just ask around…? If you investigate you will be lucky to come back with your pant’s….., if not you will not share it with anybody.
should read predominantly and not predominately.
Sorry……,
Well, Penang & s`gor can ask Perkasa to appoint, Najib will agree.
dr,
,,,the majority…unfortunately are incapable of having an original idea cos. they can’t free themselves from the restraints of logic.
,,,indeed your/mine/our time in this world may be limited, but your imagination is not !. Enjoy the occasional flight of fancy. Your creativity will build a better future !.
,,,in fact, if i had to define life in aworld, it would be ; “Life is creation.”….and you are doing a great job at it.
Dear Capt,
As much as I agree with Dr. Rafick…, LE cannot be decided by R.A….., due ot involvement of Triads…, and they encompass all the races….., if you believe me.
Councillors
10. (1) The local authority shall consist of—
(a) the Mayor or President; and
(b) not less than eight and not more than twenty-four other
Councillors,
to be appointed by the State Authority.
———
I still maintain that this does not exclude local council elections unless you interpret the Act in a very narrow way.
(Dr R- Ken, I do not wish to split hair with you. You need to study the whole ACT then you will see that the law is very clear i.e. no election. In any case if you feel you are right, we leave it at that, OK.)
It allows the state authority to appoint without an election but it does not expressly forbid elections to be held for the purpose of appointment.
Dr R- Isnt that what I am saying all along. But the election cannot be done by the EC. The state has to do it.
If a lawyer wants to challenge local elections as illegal delegation of power to appoint then your method of RA nomination with compulsory appointment may also be challenged.
Dr R- If you think in an extreme manner, semua pun boleh ma!
Nevertheless we are both not lawyers and we can argue till the cows come home. But my point is that there is enough leeway in the Act to justify LGE testing the water by asking the EC. To say that LGE acted in bad faith is unfair.
Dr R- OK la.. I will appologize to LGE when I write to him
And may I add, doc, playing politics is essential to politicians. In politics perception is everything. You may be the most straightforward, down-to-earth, just work and no nonsense politician but how will you get elected?
Ken
That is why I said that I could never survived in politics! I only know how to work and solve problems. Not good at spinning..
Dear Ken,
Since Dr Rafick……, don’t know how to spin….., we will find a stolen use RMAF FE15 fighter jet engine and turpedo him in to office……, silap haribulan…., if he miss the target we will find hin somewhere in ‘Island Tower’. Still near B.A. for S.A.R.
Come on, dr. raffick, do you really expect politicians to stop playing politics? Which party will give up the chance to score some political points? They are politicians after all.
Dr R- I expect PR to be a better politician than BN where they work more then politicising.
But having said that, I think LGE’s proposal to approach the EC first is sound. I disagree that it was done in bad faith. He needs confirmation and clarification of applicable laws and EC’s political will to do it.
Act 171 which you quoted does not specifically forbid holding local elections.
Dr R- I copy this from the Act for your reference. Which part is not clear to you. I hope you understand the line that says.. “to be appointed by the state authority”
Councillors
10. (1) The local authority shall consist of—
(a) the Mayor or President; and
(b) not less than eight and not more than twenty-four other
Councillors,
to be appointed by the State Authority.
If you interpret the Act narrowly then the method of of using RA nomination may also be excluded.
Dr R- Respectfully, in my proposal, it ends with the appointment by the State which is in line with the law! I bet you they dont want to do it to!
If LGE jumps the gun then it may be BN’s turn to score some political points! They are politicians after all.
Dr R- Many readers felt offended because I commented against PR states (Penang/Selangor). Many supports them. I supports them on many issues but it does not mean they get my support in the form of “blank checques”. Rather than defending LGE, I expect the readers to ask LGE to just implement it.
Why not take every statement at face value? Why read bad intention?
If Pakatan have asked for Local council elections, let the people urge the EC the central government to go for it.
This is the only way to move forward.
Dear Achoo,
Are you implying that we have a Referendum….., if so then the Power’s to be be should initiate…., and not give kindagarden excuse’s….., then you and I know very well where there stand.
Dear balasi
Just saying that we should accept any proposal from anyone which can benefit the people. If a Referendum is required and can help achieve the aim,why not?
Dear Achoo,
I agree with you……., but then these goon’s will say it’s a waste of Public money….., not realising that they have fleeced the country dry.
Good suggestion doc. I guess LG election is not high up in the priority list to consider creative routes.
I read the ongoing debate between DR and commentators with interest and amusement.
Perhaps some are jumping to conclusions on the merits and demerits and also the sincerity of the Penang and Selangor state governments’ call on the EC to conduct Local Council Elections (LCE).
This is how I would view the issue in contention;
1. The benefit of doubt about the sincerity of Penang and Selangor calling for the EC to conduct LCE should be given to the 2 state’s government.
Dr R- Fair but it has been 2 years brother.
2. There will always be a political slant or political consideration to what a politician will do. Are they not here as politicians? Let’s not be naive.
Dr R- Agree 300% and that is what they did exactly
3. This call for LCE should be viewed as a first and simple, straight forward call for one. Why go for a round-about solution when a straight forward one has not been tried yet?
Dr R- Why ask something that clearly as day and night that cannot be done. Isnt that a waste of time.
4. When the 1st option don’t work, then other options, including what DR proposed, can be considered.
Dr R- I agree, no harm in doing this academic excercise. Lets wait for EC to reply. I bet they will use t he ACT as a reason on why it cannot be done. If EC says cannot, I want to see whether LGE will use my suggestion. I will email him today.
5. Should the Feds reject all options, I would support a nationwide referendum/petition to have LCE.
Dr R- Ai yoo…Just wait for Pru 13, win and change everything that need to be change. No need to waste time with activities that create political sensation and at the same become detrimental to the country.
6. Or vote out the current Fed and press its replacement for LCE to be held.
Doc,
I agree absolutely with you on all counts.
As it is now we have too many politicians around. A game played all year round and governing taking a backseat.
Bringing in EC will definitely means politics, an overdose of politics.
The PR States have not exercised their rights under Act 171, instead nominating representatives of the political party in control as councillors. Where are the NGOs , community leaders, resident heads , who are mainly apolitical ?
PR is quickly learning the bad governance for appointing their own people as councillors, which they could easily have done otherwise without funfare, which they have failed to implement as their election promise. They now want to absolve from their failure and push it to the federal government.
Yes, political intention in bad faith by LGE and endorsed by KI.
Dear Ak,
Please relook at what you wrote……, might be after having a hefty lunch your thoughts when haywire…., not the way you and Dr Rafick have concluded….., they is more to the picture…….?
Mingle…..and digest…..and try to read for such action’s after two year’s..?
Don’t blame them for wasting…two damn bloody year’s, they and only they will answer the electoral come PPU 13.
Let’s think positive….., and a mean’s that can overide the power’s of EC in the states……., for you know EC is also under the Ketiak of BN.
Rather than attacking Dr for writing this piece, i think people should know that PR has promised to conduct local election more than two years ago but until now they have not talk about it even though the civil movements emphasis on it many times..the thing is that LGE called for LCE now is because they cannot afford to lose points after lot of mp’s jumping ship…is a good thing that LGE called for the LCE but it should sincere not just another 1 malaysia slogan..they should find ways to hold election without spr since spr will not be interested in holding election..for now mybe they can follow dr rafick solution as a way to return people rights to local council rather than political parties holding it… after PR hold the putrajaya later if they want they can change the law…
Doctor,
Watch Yes Prime Minister…….Power to the People…….It addresses your concern perfectly. I love it when Sir Humphery made a deal with Agnes Morehouse woman.
Your proposal mirrors Professor Mariott’s proposal. Genuine democratic but would not see the daylight of it.
I will continue in the subject with details. I am more in practical things. As for Penang, it should follow Singapore’s style. In fact, it’s.
MP being the motherhen of 3 aduns.
Dr. Raffick,
Your method of implementing LG election by using residents’ association is not wide enough. How many residents actually participate in the RAs?
Dr R- I agree there are limitations but at least this is an option. Similarly if local election is held, not all residents will actually comes out an vote. What I proposed is that RA organize a special meeting and elect two nominees. If the resident dont participate, it is their loss because they chose not to give priority to attending the meeting.
With a small group of people having the power to nominate councillors, this opens the door to money politics and business interests just like Umno elections.
Dr R- Respectfully, I disagree that it is a small group. Lets take my housing area which has 150. This is equivalent to 300 votes. This means that 300 people will chose 2 people to represent them. In JKP Zone in BA, there is about 10 RA. Each has on average about 200 houses which is 400 people per RA. Each RA will nominate 2. At the end there will be 20 people. This 20 people actually is a representative of 4000 people and they need to discuss who best among them that should serve as councillors. In this way, people are represented.
The first step to implement LG election is to ask the EC to conduct it. This step should not be bypassed first. If the EC can do this under the law this the best way as it involves all the residents and cannot be challenged. If the EC says it cannot then they can request the Federal govt to change the laws failing which other means can be explored.
Dr R- Isnt the outcome obvious enough. BN if they wanted to have local elections would have done it long time ago. They didnt and while they are in power they will not do it. Why play this political games when the outcome is clear.
So I don’t understand why you are castigating the Penang and Selangor govt for taking the first step. By your reckoning they must be very bad people to even suggest this. Their intention must be to cheat the people.
DrR- Please read again then you would understand.
Holding LG elections under EC is the best way. All other ways are compromises including using RAs. If not properly done it can be worse than the present system. The state govts should not jump into it without study and without exploring the EC option. Do give them some credit than labelling them as political charlatans.
PR should not worry about local elections. if you do your job well, people will vote for you. do not be afraid of the rakyat. UMNO/BN also hates local elections cos they will be unable to spread out the rewards to the warlords and thus prevent them from making money and their bosses. who approves converting a playground to commercial land or approving condominium projects? local council and there is lots of money in it. Thank got PR govt in Selangor do not take away playground etc and go by the book on approvals
as for not sincere, well PR wants it, UMNO/BN doesn’t want it. That is clear.
hope MB TSK is reading this
playing politics it may be, but who in the political arena is not?
to blast the opposition for ‘passing the buck’ to the government IMHO is akin to saying ‘look, it cannot be done, so stop asking’.
(Dr R- There are two sides of a coin, you must think also along both sides. I did not say that I said, why ask for something that has got an obvious answer. That is why I said playing politics. The issue is we want to have local election and it can be done and I have demonstrated how it can be done.)
while you agree that LGE (local gov election) is good for the people, you step back on your toes by calling those who are lobbying for it merely playing political games. this essentially makes you an oxymoron (not sure if this is applicable to human).
Dr Rafick- You can call me whatever you like but I had always maintain my position of looking at issues objectively and make and objective assessment. I had always called a spade- a spade
look, if there is anything that the rakyat gains from this political play, it is that the voice of the rakyat is now heard on higher level – we want LGE !
(Dr R- Did I say, I did not support LGE or oppose him anywhere in my writing? I said what he did this instance is merely a political show and with intention of passing the buck. He did not look for obvious solutions within his powers. I dont have the power that he has, yet i can put forward a simple solution and yet will to a limited extent make the local council filled with people who are elected rather than appointed by the political parties)
maybe you have not witness how local council staffs harass small businesses, extorting protection money and neglecting their duty. Our MPs have become longkang MPs because local councils are not doing their job! Do you remember about millions spent by Selayang on their trips abroad to learn night garb collection system? Yes, they brought along their whole family on the trip.
Dr R- You are deviating from the main issue of my discussion.
talking abt the laws – yes, it’s not latin. but who has the power to amend it and return LGE? tunku promised to return this to us after the Indo confrontation – he is dead now and UMNO has become a monster.
if we don’t support this call for LGE, we are no better than Myanmar. have you heard about their upcoming election plan?
Dr R- Clealy you failed to appreciate what I wrote.
so stop sitting on the fence on this one. you are neither here nor there – this is not the way to achieve great things.
Dr R- I did provide a solution. May be you should ask LGE to consider it because it works and no need to punching political jabs for something that is so obvious.
if everything fails, at least rakyat knows the current administration (UMNO/BN) and PAS are still AGAINST returning the third voice to the PEOPLE.
“Clearly when Guan Eng sent the instruction to the Election Commission to conduct the LG election; it was done with a political intention in bad faith.”
Dear Doctor,
Sometimes, you can be real mean!!! Why impute ‘bad faith’ to LGE just because he proposed local govt elections. If you say it is political, well I can accept that but ‘bad faith’?
Pakatan wants to hold the LG elections but they know the difficulties and opposition from BN. So they put BN on the defensive with the proposal. That’s why Raja Petra took off his cap to Guan Eng.
Wasn’t LG elections a Pakatan promise? Well, they want to do it but BN says “No”.
Local Governments are a conduit to ‘feed’ UMNO contractors. This is where the money is. Imagine RM 100,000 for hanging some coloured bulbs across a bridge or RM 2million for a clock tower? Where in the world can you get such easy money. From UMNO’s local governments, of course?
Dear Sam01
I said “bad faith” because he could have done in a creative manner as I had described above but he chose to play politics about it rather than doing it.
Let us be fair on making statements. I agree with you that local government is one of business conduits for politicians and their cronies. I even wrote it in para 3. In the past it was BN. In Selangor now, I have seen the same thing happening where PKR is doing it. I know because it is happening infront of my eyes.
explain your ‘creative manner’. to me, what Lim has done is creative enough at this juncture.
you hv said it yourself it is in the laws. last i check, DAP & PKR do not have the power to amend laws (yet).
Dear Kg
What lim has done is creative indeed but in the sense of playing politics and passing the buck. Life is with options. He has options infront of him and he should do it even the laws are not changed. It can be done within the current system despite the limitation of the ACT
Doc,
Lim Gung Eng is one up on Najib and BN. Ok, he can now say that he wanted to hold local govt elections but was shot down by Najib.
Then he can go to step 2, that is to conduct the election without EC.
So give him time. One at a time.
That’s why I said in one previous post that you are not cut out to be a politician.
Sam01,
Whether Raffick is cut out to be the politician, Raffick is right to say that LGE is playing to the political gallery
However, there is nothing for LGE to get political milleage. Come on! It’s really not the right time for Pakatan to conduct local government without the approval of Election Commision & the federal government
The EC & Federal government would probably sabotage them. Besides, the question of local government wielding more power than the State need to be addressed
Raffick,
I have always commented this remark. IT’S ECONOMY, STUPID! To know the history of this phrase, one got to look at how Bill Clinton clinch the presidenship from George H Bush. Bush Senior has just won the war in Iraq but lost the “war” in America. The key phrase is the Economy
Guess what! it’s a known fact that the bulk of state revenue comes from none other than
1) Assessment Rates or Property Tax (Known in Singapore)
2) Fines (By Law regulations)
If such matters not sort out, with the squeeze by Najib’s government, the state government would be left with no money to run the policies.
Which comes to a point why states like Penang, Perlis & Malacca, should abolish town councils?
Raffick,
Malaysia practices federalism. Hence, the power shared between the states & the federal government by virtue that the states themself are sovereign entities. Unfortunately, the State of Penang is not really made up of several “independent” districts & city-state.
My radical proposal of abolish the existing town councils in Penang would not damper democracy because the state representatives would assume the role.
Penang should seriously consider Singapore’s style of local government.
1) Dismantle existing town council structure
2) Establish 40 town councils with the state assemblyman as the chairman
3) The reorganisation of JKKK into something similar as those practised in Singapore. CCC & RCC. Citizen Consultative Commitees & Resident Consultative Commitees
4) Chow Kon Yeow is the chairman for Local Government commitee. Perhaps, 6 or 12 would be chosen from the State Assembly to sit in
Raffick,
Likewise for Infrastructure, Education, Health & so on & so for. There are many ways of encourage active peoples’ participations. The Ultimate aims are Transparency, Accountability & Competency.
I am not sure LGE has though of that but 2 years are rather short time to implement
Well, if such idea is accepatable, I believe this would be far more effective. Of course, the UMNOs would complain that it’s DAP’s way of consolidating in Penang….
The first order of LKY in the 1959 GE is to abolish the city council. 50 years later, Singapore is a hallmark of how HDB townships properly managed. Just pop in across the causeway & visit Woodland Town Centre & you would know the differences
Of course, it comes with a price…..
P.S : My views ain’t represent DAP though I am a DAP supporter. Not even a DAP member, let alone Cadre Member
Cadre system (Not so democratic)……Hmm……..PKR should study carefully this system from DAP, originated from PAP…….Or Anwar better rope in LKY as mentor……..Even Toh Chin Chye (wheel bound now like Karpal Singh) also can
whether it’s political machinations or not, the point is to get it out there. Why we shld have local govt elections, what it mean if we cld elect our councillors etc.
there are loopholes within the law and they have to keep trying right? u think if the PR MPs try n introduce it to be discussed within Parliament, it’ll even be allowed to be on the list of things to discuss..
I know I havent posted comments in a while but I still read faithfully
I think we shld have local govt elections, as you’ve said, it’s what the people will notice.
anyway, as we well know, the Fed Govt dont seem to want to improve public service. bah! The civil service shld be seperate from all these political parties. you do a good job cos you are a civil servant. In theory anyway.
(disgruntled).
if “appoint” is the keyword, then there is a loop hole in Act 171. The state government can have a LG election and “appoint” the winners of the LG election! Maybe a change of word will do the trick, have a LG “nomination” just to satisfy the law.
now this is ‘creative’! but still we need EC to run it. and EC as it is now is serving the needs of Najib and Rosmah only.
I disagree. EC dont have to get involved. Just make it a community affair. I assume you have a resident association in your neighborhood. Do you need EC to run the election for office bearers. You dont right? This is clear.
Doc,
It is a political strategy to widen the electoral constituencies within urban areas.